<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: crossprocessalicious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonmadison.com/archives/2005/04/22/crossprocessalicious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonmadison.com/archives/2005/04/22/crossprocessalicious/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 19:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonmadison.com/archives/2005/04/22/crossprocessalicious/comment-page-1/#comment-5451</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 06:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smartbrother.org/archives/2005/04/22/crossprocessalicious/#comment-5451</guid>
		<description>thanks so much!

I shot with kodak ektachrome 100 slide film, and had them cross processed in normal color processing (i presume C-41). i about shrieked when i got my first roll out. i didn&#039;t know what to expect, and it came out so well.

i wasn&#039;t as impressed with my next roll, but that&#039;s mainly &#039;cos i just took crummy shots (although some of the car show pics came out crossprocessalicious). 

i have gotten a few other crossprocessed rolls done, including some 120s (Holga), but it&#039;s much cheaper to get negatives only from ivey than prints (it was about $25 for prints and processing! whereas processing only w/ negatives is less than $7) 

the slide scanner is en route and should be here monday--looking forward to catching up on a gang of rolls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks so much!</p>
<p>I shot with kodak ektachrome 100 slide film, and had them cross processed in normal color processing (i presume C-41). i about shrieked when i got my first roll out. i didn&#8217;t know what to expect, and it came out so well.</p>
<p>i wasn&#8217;t as impressed with my next roll, but that&#8217;s mainly &#8216;cos i just took crummy shots (although some of the car show pics came out crossprocessalicious). </p>
<p>i have gotten a few other crossprocessed rolls done, including some 120s (Holga), but it&#8217;s much cheaper to get negatives only from ivey than prints (it was about $25 for prints and processing! whereas processing only w/ negatives is less than $7) </p>
<p>the slide scanner is en route and should be here monday&#8211;looking forward to catching up on a gang of rolls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonmadison.com/archives/2005/04/22/crossprocessalicious/comment-page-1/#comment-5450</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 22:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smartbrother.org/archives/2005/04/22/crossprocessalicious/#comment-5450</guid>
		<description>What sort of crossprocessing created that result? it&#039;s lovely :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What sort of crossprocessing created that result? it&#8217;s lovely :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joy</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonmadison.com/archives/2005/04/22/crossprocessalicious/comment-page-1/#comment-4351</link>
		<dc:creator>joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 03:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smartbrother.org/archives/2005/04/22/crossprocessalicious/#comment-4351</guid>
		<description>mmmmmmmmmmmm, beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmmmmmmmmmmm, beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

